From paulstips.com: "One of the big differences that I've noticed between those who get what they want and those who don't comes down to one simple behavior - whether they're willing to ask for it. Why are some people so afraid of making simple requests? Almost inevitably it's because of the fear of rejection. Certainly if you make a habit of asking for things, you're going to get rejected more often than if you don't. But you're also going to have your wishes granted more often. It's a trade-off - more rejection for more success. And believe me, it's a trade-off that's well worth it. The thing to understand about rejection is that it hurts less as we experience it more. With time, it starts to feel like water running off a duck's back - you hardly even notice it's there. You will become almost immune to feeling let down. Simply look upon rejection as part of the process of moving towards success. If you need to be told no ten times before you receive a yes, then you'd better start working through those no's."
I agree entirely with this sentiment, and would add one explanatory comment. Much of our fear of rejection is an evolutionary relic. Such fear was appropriate in a small hunter-gatherer community in which a single rejection could result in permanent social ostracism, and our genes were shaped by such an environment. But in modern society, communities are fragmented and often non-overlapping, and many of the people you meet today you'll never see again. Retaining this evolutionarily induced caution when interacting with strangers and casual acquaintances is maladaptive and unnecessarily restrictive. When your instincts tell you one thing and your reason tells you another, it's often better go with your reason. Get out there, make a few mistakes, make some slightly outrageous requests, and don't worry about what people think. As long as you don't break the law, it probably won't go on your permanent record.
I agree entirely with this sentiment, and would add one explanatory comment. Much of our fear of rejection is an evolutionary relic. Such fear was appropriate in a small hunter-gatherer community in which a single rejection could result in permanent social ostracism, and our genes were shaped by such an environment. But in modern society, communities are fragmented and often non-overlapping, and many of the people you meet today you'll never see again. Retaining this evolutionarily induced caution when interacting with strangers and casual acquaintances is maladaptive and unnecessarily restrictive. When your instincts tell you one thing and your reason tells you another, it's often better go with your reason. Get out there, make a few mistakes, make some slightly outrageous requests, and don't worry about what people think. As long as you don't break the law, it probably won't go on your permanent record.


3 Comments:
I agree that we should be more willing to ask questions, however I disagree with your suggestion that this desire to avoid rejection has occurred through evolutionary processes. Can you give some resources on evolution that have you convinced it of its truthfulness?
By
David Mackey, at 5:23 PM
I can't cite any sources because I arrived at this conclusion independently (although I certainly wouldn't claim credit for it, as others have no doubt thought of it before me, and I'm sure my position was shaped by other authors). But if you accept my premiss that the default behavior humans currently display is largely determined by their genes (which were shaped in an environment very different from ours), then whenever we feel it's logical to behave in one way but our instincts pull us another way, it's likely that our instincts are pulling us toward the correct behavior for our environment of evolutionary adaptedness (EEA) and our reasoning is pulling us toward the correct behavior for our current environment. (Obviously there are confounding factors, like memes). The specific behavior being discussed here (fear of rejection) seems to fit this pattern. Fear of public speaking is at the top of most people's lists of fears. Most people are very cautious about what they say in public, even when surrounded by strangers they'll never see again. There were few strangers in the EEA and so every human interaction could theoretically lead to social ostracism, and I think that's what causes the excessive caution most people exhibit today. Having said all that, I now realize that my original post should've made it clear that this was my opinion rather than a generally accepted fact.
By
howtolive.org, at 8:25 AM
There is a text from Kashmir which describes a meditation approximately along those lines. It says (I am paraphrasing) that when you reach for something and notice that it is not there, pay attention, because God is revealing himself to you in that moment. There are a lot of overtones to this idea -- God is used in a philosophical sense as a principle, as opposed to how the term is used in charismatic religion. But one of the most powerful aspects of the idea for me is that wanting, per se, is not wrong, being attached to outcomes is wrong. Go ahead and desire and strive, but be responsive to whatever comes. Desire and striving are part of who you are, and fulfillment and disappointment are part of what happens to you -- all of that together (and countless other things) makes up reality.
By
James D Newman, at 2:26 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home